Audio Technica ATH-M40x, headphones

Audio Technica ATH-M40x

£99

Frequency response: 15 Hz to 24 kHz

Impedance: 35 Ohms

At the cheaper end of the headphone market, you have to expect a few compromises. Sound quality probably isn’t going to be as precise and revealing as more expensive models, while build quality and durability might also suffer as manufacturers cut corners to reduce costs.

But it’s still possible to get a good pair of headphones on a relatively tight budget. Audio Technica’s impressive ATH-M40xs are a great example. They’re excellent all-rounders, with decent build quality and a much more precise sound than their price tag might suggest. They’re not the flattest headphones in the world, but they’re revealing and accurate enough for studio use (plus punchy enough for DJ use if necessary).

At this price, it’s a pleasant surprise to see a removable cable, which is easily replaced should it get damaged. The M40s are also supplied with both straight and coiled cables – a very nice touch. The only significant weakness of the M40x is its relatively poor isolation; the cups don’t form a particularly tight seal around the ear, letting bit of sound spill out (and ambient noise to spill in). Whether that’s a problem or not depends on your intended use, but it’s a fairly small issue to overlook at this price.

it’s still possible to get a good pair of headphones on a relatively tight budget

The M40s are listed at £99 but widely available at around £70. If you can afford to step up the range then the M50xs (priced at £159) are significantly better, but if you’re on a budget the M40x is still a great choice. The cheaper M20x and M30x models are reasonable, but we’d really recommend saving up a little longer and going for the M40s if possible.

23rd March, 2015

Comments

  • I Can definitely vouch for the focal spirit’s. They’re incredibly detailed, but still give me the punch and sense of energy (a la HD25) when producing electronic music. Also versatile in that they can be warmed up with a nice DAC and used as casual listening headphones.

    Report
  • You can’t have an article that reads “Ten of the best: headphones for music production” and then almost only include budget headphones. Almost all these headphones are low-budget. What about Audeze’s LCD line and Sennheiser HD800? They beat the crap out of the HD650’s.

    Report
  • I have Focal speakers and absolutely love them so would be interested in hearing their headphones.

    The best and most honest headphones I’ve ever used for production are the Shure SRH1840 (which are open back)
    http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jul12/articles/shure-srh1840.htm

    Report
  • Title should say “best headphones for music production on a budget”.
    Audeze make great headphones, but theyre not in the same price range as the other cans mentioned. Their cheapest model El-8 is twice the retail price of HD650s. Not to mention the high end headphones need an amp and proper DAC to achieve their full potential.

    Report
  • My friend has got the mx 40’s and holy moly they are amazing! The sound from them headphones are incredibly full and kinda vibrant, everything is crystal clear and literally just

    Report
  • Audeze’s are stupidly overpriced and not very good for producing. Nice flattering hifi sound and everything but I AB’d the LCD3’s against HD600’s and they’re nowhere near as revealing. I’d take the 600’s any time. Oh, did I mention they’re over a grand cheaper?…

    Report
  • I guarantee if you held a single-blind listening test, most producers and engineers tastes wouldn’t correlate preference with price point.

    I have K240iis myself. They are nice and clear and I love the open back design sound. They do not feel as robust as some DJ headphones that I have, and that’s my only compliant, which is rather a moot point for their main purpose.

    Report
  • The KRK KNS-8400 are great for mixing they don’t cost a lot and at the opposite end of the spectrum sit the Sennheiser HD800 they are also great for mixing …. I’m actually somewhat surprised at what this article included and missed. Ah-well .. I hope somebody doesn’t use this as their sole reference when buying.

    Report
  • In fairness to the article, it sais “ten OF the best” headphones. Not “THE top 10″… Can’t expect the writer to have listened to every headphone ever made

    Report
  • Ha, I knew the MDR-7510 would be on the list. I literally only bought them because Aphex said they were the best he’d ever heard

    Report
  • I’ve got the HD600 and the HD650 and the 600’s are by far the better headphone for making critical mix decisions.

    Report
  • I love my DT-770’s for producing techno. Incredible bass, soundstage, and detailed high end!

    Highly recommended phones!

    Report
  • Really love my DT-880. Great sound, good build quality and definitely worth the price.

    Report
  • No Denon’s? Though discontinued, the DH2000’s are remarkably flat, and dead-honest, while still having lots of balls. They’re linear down to around 30 hz, with no bump like the DT770’s f.e.

    Report
  • Also discontinued and recommended for AWESOME BASS LOVERS (dubstepelectrotrapwompwobbleetc.)…

    I highly recommend the Sony MDR-XB700.

    I have no idea why Sony discontinued them, only to watch the price rise over triplefold in used auctions and the like. The XB700s are warm, punchy, and deliver an ultra low-end that’s relevant to a lot of modern dance music — great for nailing those sub tones without monitor speakers! Yes, you can entirely mix & master on these. The phat bass doesn’t obscure shiny details in the upper registers. When using with a computer, consider pairing with a quality preamp like RME’s audio interfaces.

    See if you can find a pair and hear if they’re right for you… I originally got my pairs for $60-80, an impressive bargain.

    Report
  • The Sennheiser 600 is more neutral, flatter frequency than the 650.
    It`s cheaper too

    Report
  • The ATH M40x seems to have a balanced, flatter frequency response curve than even the 50. Seems like a top notch buy for the price although there’s a slight 4Db variation around the 100-400hz mark between L & R. Still, incredibly accurate responses on the bass and high frequencies (12,000 – 20,000 Hz)

    Report
  • Disappointed that Beats by Dre weren’t in this list. You just can’t beat the de boxing specs

    Report
  • above – LOL beats by dre … really? Peace of crap!

    I am surprised that the beyerdynamic dt 880 pro are listed but the dt 990 pro not. They are so much detailed, brilliant and punchy! Really missing that one.

    Report
  • Well as we all know the most important thing about a good pair of headphones is how cool you look wearing them, some of these are ugly! Where are the beats headphones by my main G Dr Dre?

    Report
  • The Shure 840 are great. I’ve been using them for 4-5 years now and love them. Switched from Sony’s and Sen’s and never looked back.

    Report
  • This article was very helpful! Thanks a lot

    Report
  • Great article – like the Focals, might buy a set on payday 🙂

    Report
  • Thanks, this was a great article. I can appreciate they are looking after producers with a budget. 🙂

    Report
  • This headphones you should listen for the overall development.
    Price low to high
    Yamaha RH-5ma — great budget, detail sound, great bass
    AKG 545 — clear, detail sound, good bass.
    Yamaha HPH 220 — undervalued, i think best for electronic music, they have all you need.
    Beyerdynamic 770\80 — frequency resp have downturn on mids, a.o. the sound in 770 like in speakers, wide space.
    Beyerdynamic 250/250 — very dry and monitor sound, great hi and mid. Downturn on bass from 20 to 100. But if you have monitors with great bass its headphones for you.
    Sennheiser HD600/HD650 — classic.
    Audeze LCD series — great, but for this price you can buy good speakers)

    Report
  • Had a pair of Sennheiser HD 25A for 13 years, with me on travels, gigs, in the studio for 10 years. Finally, I gave them to a kid I met in California. Still working of course. My point? Read that again.

    Report
  • I think the Shure SRH 1440s are a total classic and I love mine!

    Report
  • I have the Focal Spirit pros and they sound amazing but after about 6 months of careful use cracks are appearing on the sides, this has been well reported elsewhere, and could be due to size of head I just hope they can improve the build quality. I also have Focal monitors and they pair really well with those.

    Report
  • I think Audio Technica ATH M50x is missed in this list.

    Report
  • DT990 FTW 🙂

    Report
  • I have the HD25 sp ii …for almost 4 years as of now…My production has been tight , as the Lo Mid and Hi mid frequencies are outstanding ….The Mixes are sounding are phenomenal , after churning the Masters .

    Report
  • For the music lovers who understands digital technology: Turtle Beach has headphones that process in the digital domain, with dual band wi-fi, multiple soundfields, EQ presets, pure digital processing right up to the ear cups, user selectable EQ, programmable memory wheel, 50mm rare earth drivers, OFC, and Dolby Digital Surround, user selectable 2.1, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1, 6.1, 7.1 DTS. Comparable to audiophile headphones when using analog wired connection. When used in digital dual band wi-fi and bluetooth, they are superior to an analog OFC connection. Flat, extended response, incredible detail, powerful and clean. They are not for studio engineers who process in analog, but have a microphone (removable) that could be handy for DJ’s and all the bell and whistles with quality sound and hours of comfort that an audiophile would want. They can run as high as $300+ for some models. 3 year warranty is typical, not 90 days like some headphone brands. Give a listen, read reviews, this technology is going to obsolete speaker wires when speakers have self contained bi-amplification.

    Report
  • I agree about the sound quality of the Focal Spirit Pros. It was a bit shocking going from Sony MDR 7506s to the Focals, I hadn’t realized just how hyped up the low and high ends were on on my MDRs.

    Report
  • Shure SRH 940????

    Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You currently have an ad blocker installed

Attack Magazine is funded by advertising revenue. To help support our original content, please consider whitelisting Attack in your ad blocker software.

Find out how

x