With more new record labels being launched than ever before, standing out from the crowd is crucial to success. But if great music doesn’t necessarily make a great label, what other factors determine the success or failure of an imprint? We spoke to some of the most successful dance labels – and some of the young pretenders trying to knock them off their thrones.

Midland by James Clothier 2

Midland, pictured thinking about his new Graded imprint (probably)

Running a label is easy. The day-to-day process, at least. Anyone can do that bit. Running a good label? That’s a whole different ball game. Think for a moment about your own favourite imprints and what characterises them. Whether they’re genre-defining legends like Trax, Warp, Strictly Rhythm, Transmat and Metalheadz or more recent names like Hyperdub, Ostgut Ton, Ed Banger and LIES, chances are it will be far more than just the music, because there are many labels that release great music, but that doesn’t necessarily make them great labels. The true standouts are those that make your heart flutter when you see their logo popping out at you from a record rack – those buy-on-sight guarantees of quality and a clearly defined aesthetic; those whose way of doing things you admire; labels whose entire ethos you subscribe to.

The best record labels are cultural icons that can reflect the era we live in as well as any social study. They are historical journals, forever setting in stone musical trends, format fetishes and other signs of the times. They aren’t just about delivering music to people – if all you care about is letting people hear your music, get a SoundCloud account. They’re about identities and stories, communities and, in some cases, whole lifestyles. The labels to which we submit and subscribe are those we consciously or sub-consciously allow to define our own identities; they’re extensions of our personalities, signifiers of our self.

The best record labels are cultural icons that can reflect the times we live in.

Easier than ever

Starting a label in 2013 is easier than it’s ever been. Digital music can be released in your sleep and even pressing a small vinyl run is a fairly straightforward process. That said, 2013 is also the toughest time to start a label thanks to the ever-rising tide of homogenised averageness which gets released each and every day. No longer are 300 hand stamped, ‘limited’ white labels enough to get you noticed (except, most likely, for the wrong reason). Barely a day goes by without a new label being announced, and when pressed about their motivation for adding to a saturated market, all too many label owners resort to that trite platitude: “We just want to release good music that we like.” So where do you start? Is a desire to take control of the release process sufficient justification for launching a label?

For Midland, currently enjoying the success of release 001 on his newly minted Graded, it was “just a desire to present my music in the way I want to, with an emphasis on distinctive artwork and a collectable vinyl product. I want the label to feel hand made,” he continues, “from the artwork to the music; something that has the digital edges rounded off.” And with that he has an MO, the basis of a clearly defined aesthetic, a loose template on which to build in the future.

Detroit sex-punk Jimmy Edgar had grander designs from the off. His new Ultramajic label – run with Machinedrum – has been birthed to “develop artists, develop a new sound for myself and take this visual journey more seriously. I’ve always been a student of occult, quantum physics, new age philosophies and the esoteric, so we’re playing with these ideas very subtly through the label.” Of course, it will take the passage of time and arrival of a few releases for these concepts to be implanted on the brains of those who buy Ultramajic releases, but if you don’t start right, you ain’t gonna end right.

I’ve always been a student of occult, quantum physics, new age philosophies and the esoteric, so we’re playing with these ideas very subtly through the label.

Format fetishism

And then there’s the format itself. Midland admits to having had sleepless nights deciding on whether to be vinyl-only before coming to the conclusion that “it’s not my place to dictate what format someone buys and plays my music on”. Jimmy Edgar also stresses its importance: “It can make or break a label,” he explains. “For us it’s an advantage to have a really slick physical product because we want to create monumental statements.”

Dixon Avenue Basement Jams concur on the importance of image: “Originally we had planned to just do white labels with no stamp and no info at all, but we thought after a while that would get boring for us and also, from my own personal experience working in Rubadub, white label records with no art tend to end up stuffed behind other releases on the wall, so we wanted something that would stand out on a record store wall and would be instantly recognisable.”

Not every label is conceived with such forethought, though. Since 2005, Yossi Amoyal has run the Sushitech label, home to luminaries such as Delano Smith and Steve O’Sullivan. “I always wanted to let the music be the driving force behind the label,” he explains, “rather than a release schedule or brand. The music dictates our schedule rather than the other way round, so we might have two releases a year or 10, it all depends on the music and if the artists and I feel right releasing it.”

At this point it’s important to consider the bravery – and by the same token, restraint – required to run a decent label. It would be easy to get sucked into a regular release schedule for a number of reasons – it keeps you in the public eye, you increase your chances of having a big hit, of becoming flavour of the month and so on, but once you set out your stall, you’d better hope you have badass beats on tap or you will inevitably have to lower your quality levels just to keep up with your own self-imposed schedule.

While avoiding the temptation to release more frequently and run the risk of reducing quality control, many of the label bosses we spoke to stressed the importance of sticking to a cohesive musical style rather than getting tempted to branch out into too many sounds at once. “You can find almost anything in my collection, but that doesn’t mean that I’ll release all these sounds and genres on Sushitech,” reckons Yossi. “If I did, it would be difficult to present the concise vision and message of our art as well as I hope to.” Critical boss Kasra puts it a different way: “It’s not a lack of ambition; you have to stick to what you know. Every scene needs labels that do their own, different stuff.”

Author Kristan Caryl
30th August, 2013


  • Really good read. For me the obvious sign of a good label is one whose releases I always want to check out even if I’ve never heard of the artist. A great label isn’t necessarily a guarantee of quality, but it should be a sign that something’s worth checking out. Off the top of my head, the one label that really does that right now is Hyperdub. Because of them I’ve discovered stuff like Fhloston Paradigm and Jessy Lanza. I definitely don’t like EVERYTHING they release but I’m always willing to give it a listen.

    I’m not sure how much the artwork really matters. It’s nice to have a good logo or an instantly recognisable standard sleeve design but I don’t think I’ve ever really checked out a record just because it had a nice sleeve.

    Ultimately I think it’s about doing something unique. There are so many vanity project labels about at the moment that all just do the same stuff. Like you say – “just putting out music we like”. To me that’s a total cop out. That’s the LEAST you should be doing! There’s no sense of identity to most of those labels. I think we’ll see a lot of them fade away within a few years.

  • this is a great article and pretty sums up the mentality needed and required to run a label i.e. the realisation that there are no distinct rules and creating your own path- i feel are very important and key to the success of it.

  • Nice article. I would’ve liked to see some opinions on the role of vinyl as far as establishing a perception of legitimacy of a new label with unheard of artists.

    Perhaps I am cynical, but the liklihood of a new digital label – irrespective of quality – with completely unheard of artists – getting noticed amongst the deluge of releases is very, very slim.

    In this instance, does having a (quality) vinyl release help establish a perception of legitimacy that distinguishes a new label from the hundreds of digital labels that launch every week?

  • the answer to that question is no citizen. you have to realise that there are now enough vinyl releases to keep people more then occupied for a couple of years, released on a regular basis too.

    the problem with quality in general, is that you cant just ignore it- in most cases 90% of labels think they enforce quality controls, but most do not in fact- the problem with digital is that its just easier to set up this platform to carry out this procedure with no real quality control.

  • This is exactly what I needed to read; this article came at the right time, just when I’ve started having thoughts starting up my own label myself. I want to open a label to put out my own music, then plan on expanding and possibly signing other artists (and then expanding some more into other facets i.e. art, fashion). Thanks for this!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You currently have an ad blocker installed

Attack Magazine is funded by advertising revenue. To help support our original content, please consider whitelisting Attack in your ad blocker software.

Find out how