Is there a tendency to think trance is cheesy, cheap or obvious, do you think?

Most certainly. 20 years of godawful music made under that banner has tainted the term almost beyond redemption. When I was asked to do a mix for the White Light series last year I told them I wanted to do a trance mix to reclaim that word. I think they were initially a little worried about what I would submit as the term has such negative connotations and instantly evokes a certain sound in people’s minds.

Do you get a sense it’s coming back at all or do you think it’s always been there?

I think it’s always been there hiding in plain sight and not shouting from the rooftops, ‘I’m a trance track’. Lots of big dance hits of the last few years have been trance in disguise. A lot of what Todd Terje or Lindstrøm produced, for example. One of the biggest tracks I played in the last year was RRose’s ‘Waterfall’ – I’d call that trance. They may hate me for saying it, but I’d call a lot of Daniel Avery, Levon Vincent, Silent Servant and some of Omar-S’s tracks trance. Oni Ayhun’s OAR003 B is a track almost everyone loves – 100% pure trance. It all comes down to one’s personal definition of what it is. Maybe ‘hypno’ is a better term?

They may hate me for saying it, but I'd call a lot of Daniel Avery, Levon Vincent, Silent Servant and some of Omar-S's tracks trance.

Would you be up for a revival?

I’m generally not up for reviving anything. I’ll happily revisit, rediscover or even discover for the first time music from the past but revivals generally hit a brick wall fairly quickly. Seeking inspiration from and doing something new with it is a different matter. The recent James Holden album is perhaps my favourite record of 2013 and to me is pure trance, but it is a zillion light years away from most people’s definition of that and most certainly isn’t reviving anything. I certainly don’t want a revival of early 90s big room, euphoric trance or some horrible hybrid such as say trap-trance. If anything like that becomes the next in thing you can be sure I’ll be running as fast as I can in the opposite direction, but in the meantime I can’t imagine I’ll ever stop playing some records that are my definition of trance.

Do you often drop trance in clubs? What are the reactions like?

Sure. All the time. But I’m fairly certain nobody’s thinking, “He’s playing a trance track…”


Find Twitch on Facebook, Twitter and SoundCloud.

21st March, 2014


  • Great read.

    Trance as a genre is totally irredeemable. Cheesy chords, Europeans in tight t-shirts, crusties, white hippies with dreadlocks. And Tiesto. Ugh. I can’t remember a time when it ever was cool. I’m too young to have heard any of the early 90s stuff in clubs but I remember the late 90s well, when the UK charts were full of stuff like Alice Deejay, ATB, Darude and Sash. All total shit, and I’ve never heard any credible alternative which has convinced me that there’s anything better lurking in so-called ‘underground’ trance. Seriously, if such a thing exists then I’d love to hear it but I doubt it.

    Trance as a concept is an entirely different matter. If trance means being engrossed by repetition in dancefloor-focused music then isn’t that something which just about every genre aspires to? That last answer sums it up: you can still get away with trance-style music just as long as you hide the fact it’s trance. Don’t mention the t-word.

  • We only know the above wanky comment isn’t by Guy Veale due to the syntax being unrecognisable, and the fact that it’s in dire need of a jolly good edit.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You currently have an ad blocker installed

Attack Magazine is funded by advertising revenue. To help support our original content, please consider whitelisting Attack in your ad blocker software.

Find out how